[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [linux_var] [Reproducible-builds] Raspi 3 suitable for arm64?

To: linux_var - LUG di Varese e Provincia Mailing List <talking@ml.linuxvar.it>
Subject: Re: [linux_var] [Reproducible-builds] Raspi 3 suitable for arm64?
From: Luca Lesinigo <luca@lesinigo.it>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:21:43 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of talking-bounces@ml.linuxvar.it designates 79.143.178.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=talking-bounces@ml.linuxvar.it; dkim=pass header.i=@ml.linuxvar.it
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: jacopogg83@gmail.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ml.linuxvar.it; s=mail; t=1457346117; bh=LIpKxJfX4wVA6ulBSTSVkJz0sC68+4IPtm0mQjqeONc=; h=From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Reply-To; z=From:=20Luca=20Lesinigo=20<luca@lesinigo.it>|In-Reply-To:=20<2016 0307071859.GA29737@home.home.trueelena.org>|Date:=20Mon,=207=20Mar =202016=2011:21:43=20+0100|References:=20<20160307071859.GA29737@h ome.home.trueelena.org>|To:=20linux_var=20-=20LUG=20di=20Varese=20 e=20Provincia=20Mailing=20List=20<talking@ml.linuxvar.it>|Subject: =20Re:=20[linux_var]=20[Reproducible-builds]=20Raspi=203=20suitabl e=20for=20arm64?|List-Id:=20linux_var=20-=20LUG=20di=20Varese=20e= 20Provincia=20Mailing=20List=0D=0A=20<talking.ml.linuxvar.it>|List -Unsubscribe:=20<http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tal king>,=0D=0A=20<mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=3Dun subscribe>|List-Archive:=20<http://ml.linuxvar.it/pipermail/talkin g/>|List-Post:=20<mailto:talking@ml.linuxvar.it>|List-Help:=20<mai lto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=3Dhelp>|List-Subscribe: =20<http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talking>,=0D=0A =20<mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=3Dsubscribe>|Rep ly-To:=20linux_var=20-=20LUG=20di=20Varese=20e=20Provincia=20Maili ng=20List=0D=0A=20<talking@ml.linuxvar.it>; b=F6z2WNRs6OaueHEQaW+5B75R2L/PiQlx5Yho2uofpvaYLohAYa0hCuEcQmx0Om3fv zTkPC/F79I9/wbsNIXIt5aH/g/9BN9Yikv3+QPMfAGALVKlTLM/PXxE6ATnRHJVT6Y UPiPNO3FkfEdBinRH7dOdUtIm+ABn2P2YS1GBnXQ=
In-reply-to: <20160307071859.GA29737@home.home.trueelena.org>
List-archive: <http://ml.linuxvar.it/pipermail/talking/>
List-help: <mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=help>
List-id: linux_var - LUG di Varese e Provincia Mailing List <talking.ml.linuxvar.it>
List-post: <mailto:talking@ml.linuxvar.it>
List-subscribe: <http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talking>, <mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/options/talking>, <mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20160307071859.GA29737@home.home.trueelena.org>
Reply-to: linux_var - LUG di Varese e Provincia Mailing List <talking@ml.linuxvar.it>
Sender: "Talking" <talking-bounces@ml.linuxvar.it>

Il giorno 07 mar 2016, alle ore 08:19, Elena ``of Valhalla'' <valhalla-l@trueelena.org> ha scritto:
> nel caso qualcuno stesse pensando di prenderlo in quanto arm64: non è
> detto che sia usabile come tale. C'è da dire che è la situazione di un
> po' tutte le schede arm64 a prezzi umani che io conosca per ora son
> supportate via software sono con l'android del produttore.
Vale la pena citare anche l’annuncio originale [da https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/#raspberry-pi-3-on-sale ]:

At launch, we are using the same 32-bit Raspbian userland that we use on other Raspberry Pi devices; over the next few months we will investigate whether there is value in moving to 64-bit mode.

Nel caso qualcuno stesse pensando di prenderlo in quanto arm64: in effetti resta da vedere se su quella particolare cpu ci sia veramente beneficio a far girare il codice in versione 64bit, non è automaticamente detto che ne valga la pena.

--
Luca Lesinigo

_______________________________________________
Talking mailing list
Talking@ml.linuxvar.it
http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talking

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux_var] [Reproducible-builds] Raspi 3 suitable for arm64?
  - From: Diego Roversi <diegor@tiscali.it>

References:
- [linux_var] Fwd: Re: [Reproducible-builds] Raspi 3 suitable for arm64?
  - From: Elena ``of Valhalla'' <valhalla-l@trueelena.org>

Prev by Date: [linux_var] Fwd: Re: [Reproducible-builds] Raspi 3 suitable for arm64?
Next by Date: Re: [linux_var] [Reproducible-builds] Raspi 3 suitable for arm64?
Previous by thread: [linux_var] Fwd: Re: [Reproducible-builds] Raspi 3 suitable for arm64?
Next by thread: Re: [linux_var] [Reproducible-builds] Raspi 3 suitable for arm64?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread