[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [linux_var] SSD 970 EVO su server proxmox

To: talking@ml.linuxvar.it
Subject: Re: [linux_var] SSD 970 EVO su server proxmox
From: ross <rcrispo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:31:32 +0100
Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ml.linuxvar.it header.s=mail header.b=V696ZK7n; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=TUsfykDU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of talking-bounces@ml.linuxvar.it designates 94.177.176.165 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=talking-bounces@ml.linuxvar.it; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:content-transfer-encoding:reply-to:list-subscribe :list-help:list-post:list-archive:list-unsubscribe:list-id :precedence:subject:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:to:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=l47lqumGiuL6pu51jyEx/XipaMvOCHxQYKl8IguYf2c=; b=zQJxrDLdZtEJRDOBW1vJ/pAECmiC6tHxvJd+boXCrOuScEE2DhgVL0vfeadrKOmOZ7 G1MyGVQSTxPzsrbIekeU6SYcvVcjYmDbAvgwpKUlK1xbeEVWRqJoEKGXt5NHm0DDqfpf V+70lX5xwH1CUFDUbjO2gxFwBLxxdjgzBGPuc1XvbBRL1MGqmtzwvkKPUbBDgPXyG/+u aaSopCgLAhj5AWiA1KnQAY1aZIRJiM+/nLJkk4P57TtRj6IGGrHlNTyG3itBGiTm6QJR xHCZPVyaKgMIKjnnaRmwQNr3dWoR/WAol2fQ8Z5jvhLTK0EUV42k3OBj6bvybNIy7uRY ATUg==
Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1546525913; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=q6Yi391uLBHk9iMO+p9bS5BTG7mzpShB9ufYW9M+l9O5e9/IPT1nOzQfJAUCImT2jQ 4xIcbgEKpZI2Yr80jEm3CFeq83aExKhN1p+PP71mw9p2zazH9EPN0dmQzd3fFTBFrKeD q7xTV4k7VgIvUXXNPARymndvfvxvHdHKVJacbtPqTJxm/IBq2PnvIPpCVF/IYi0GER++ D2kroA2SDsmjjMA3LL7dK+ZMfKoqzC32AvFvSQi7c2cpBhjRHi1+nnk/WbSYBW/TmF67 AK9HyUEp61kqhTZpseQC+DgMggqDj0xIrHTId/a8hVPMgyA3TWMXau3VBxiCVAX8Z2d/ kxtA==
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ml.linuxvar.it header.s=mail header.b=V696ZK7n; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=TUsfykDU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of talking-bounces@ml.linuxvar.it designates 94.177.176.165 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=talking-bounces@ml.linuxvar.it; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-results: work1; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="TUsfykDU"; dkim-atps=neutral
Delivered-to: g.crinux@gmail.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ml.linuxvar.it; s=mail; t=1546525896; bh=l47lqumGiuL6pu51jyEx/XipaMvOCHxQYKl8IguYf2c=; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Reply-To:From; z=To:=20talking@ml.linuxvar.it|References:=20<CAGod1SDk37c+O_1GNdEe 0nB0vW1WCG8JXgi+_40QfHvRf0m5Lg@mail.gmail.com>|From:=20ross=20<rcr ispo@gmail.com>|Date:=20Thu,=203=20Jan=202019=2015:31:32=20+0100|I n-Reply-To:=20<CAGod1SDk37c+O_1GNdEe0nB0vW1WCG8JXgi+_40QfHvRf0m5Lg @mail.gmail.com>|Subject:=20Re:=20[linux_var]=20SSD=20970=20EVO=20 su=20server=20proxmox|List-Id:=20linux_var=20-=20LUG=20di=20Varese =20e=20Provincia=20Mailing=20List=0D=0A=20<talking.ml.linuxvar.it> |List-Unsubscribe:=20<http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/option s/talking>,=0D=0A=20<mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject =3Dunsubscribe>|List-Archive:=20<http://ml.linuxvar.it/pipermail/t alking/>|List-Post:=20<mailto:talking@ml.linuxvar.it>|List-Help:=2 0<mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=3Dhelp>|List-Subsc ribe:=20<http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talking>,= 0D=0A=20<mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=3Dsubscribe >|Reply-To:=20linux_var=20-=20LUG=20di=20Varese=20e=20Provincia=20 Mailing=20List=0D=0A=20<talking@ml.linuxvar.it>; b=V696ZK7nCdrLdELp9wr1ucjG7MRGPSXT3TcwOlgmeT0BS03qEdxSCxl1cxJMtx3B5 4PIlS++akx3mPMgPNEn4k8vdCtkv1GZFZJHSKLvLmWFBXrqSpyaKHk0FYUK90U1cRm n0uHTrlDJ009CEobBg28NmDof+F+qe9+wGZ25oKI=
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=b1+M06ha6nBzaeFtEoTo42iVPi1vSgPdN4L92T8WW1Y=; b=TUsfykDU16Aqcx/ZUCXy/v2PCzBhIxUs2VQ0tZnOF9onboH76poV+7jX2jrmwbAfEL 7JuEZVIkRHrTw9GRGpnAztevhfGUGTaonsREa9eSsyZk1VfBHOlwGBNfCDu2Cr7KWfzI Q6I1y89uKunMH3kROr3oTs7c6XLLKwsWzlQGePFhpnovpTTQMnMQj6WJu9jzhKXk0aCy dl4PzxMgTtGEqMCAF/P8icu/X5Nn/NrtBgBnDukUsbCKQePJN5X26FIDAyCAcJ7pyXeE 67D+IAKL4Mmf/yWR6uWzAbLB9YQWzrpMqnrNxmkNU18UYUzbI2NO3JFbyPfRLOtCd86Q vuUg==
In-reply-to: <CAGod1SDk37c+O_1GNdEe0nB0vW1WCG8JXgi+_40QfHvRf0m5Lg@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://ml.linuxvar.it/pipermail/talking/>
List-help: <mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=help>
List-id: linux_var - LUG di Varese e Provincia Mailing List <talking.ml.linuxvar.it>
List-post: <mailto:talking@ml.linuxvar.it>
List-subscribe: <http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talking>, <mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/options/talking>, <mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAGod1SDk37c+O_1GNdEe0nB0vW1WCG8JXgi+_40QfHvRf0m5Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: linux_var - LUG di Varese e Provincia Mailing List <talking@ml.linuxvar.it>
Sender: "Talking" <talking-bounces@ml.linuxvar.it>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1

Ciao
io ho usato hd ssd su nas qnap in raid e quando ci sono stati problemi
sono stati buttati fuori dal raid e mandato mail.

i QNAP essendo macchine con grossa movimentazione di file e di grandidimensioni anche, ho notato che era meglio gli hd meccanici.

In un anno due hd meccanici contro 5 sdd.

Con proxmox in versione 5 c'e gestione smart ma non so dirti come funziona.

Io sulle mie macchine avendo delle controller raid ho dovuto fare tuttoda fuori proxmox.


Ross



Il 03/01/19 12:16, Giovanni Orlandi ha scritto:

Ciao a tutti,
volevo mettere su un serverino Proxmox e pensavo di metterci come mainstorage questo NVME
SSD 970 EVO da 1TB
e poi fare replica su hard disk meccanico.

Chiedevo se qualcuno avesse esperienza sull'affidabilità di questi attrezzi,
in particolare se con applicazioni tipo smartctl si riesce ad avere unallarme appena iniziano a sbarellare.Magari sapere se questi controlli sono supportati in maniera nativa daproxmox.
L'idea è averne qualcuno di scorta ed appena ci sono problemi, sostituisco.
La QUESTIO è se riesco ad accorgermi SUBITO che ci sono problemi oppuredopo settimane che gli utenti
lamentano disservizi e dopo che ho avuto perdita di dati.

Avete esperienze in merito ?
Grazie,
Giovanni
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Solo l'Amore resta", Chiara Amirante, Nuovi Orizzonti
GSM 345.6050488 - 06.916507854 - Fax 06.62204735


_______________________________________________
Talking mailing list
Talking@ml.linuxvar.it
http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talking

_______________________________________________
Talking mailing list
Talking@ml.linuxvar.it
http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talking

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux_var] SSD 970 EVO su server proxmox
  - From: Giovanni Orlandi <orlangio@gmail.com>

References:
- [linux_var] SSD 970 EVO su server proxmox
  - From: Giovanni Orlandi <orlangio@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [linux_var] SSD 970 EVO su server proxmox
Next by Date: Re: [linux_var] SSD 970 EVO su server proxmox
Previous by thread: Re: [linux_var] SSD 970 EVO su server proxmox
Next by thread: Re: [linux_var] SSD 970 EVO su server proxmox
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread