[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [linux_var] shellshock quali sw a rischio ?

To: linux_var - LUG di Varese e Provincia Mailing List <talking@ml.linuxvar.it>
Subject: Re: [linux_var] shellshock quali sw a rischio ?
From: Gabriele Biucchi <gbiucchi@yahoo.de>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 13:27:05 +0100
Authentication-results: linuxvar.it; dkim=pass reason="1024-bit key; insecure key" header.d=yahoo.com header.i=@yahoo.com header.b=Ur8tkUQk; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy); dkim-atps=neutral
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ml.linuxvar.it; s=mail; t=1411820965; bh=0CCEK5GN/puRzdOjFPoi4EHrQ2yHUC/+YNGS8yCH59M=; h=References:Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; z=References:=20<CAGod1SBAZ9Htw0MF=3DnRQjV_DpE17k0s00q-AejAW=3DGYKF 2nByg@mail.gmail.com>=0D=0A=20<NCI90V$3707C83068D46F597C5A2374ABEB C851@teletu.it>=0D=0A=20<CAFzX3+d+sdJsHr_oEC6aNxFvxt57amQ2uXytAQd_ n6EOwZ7X6g@mail.gmail.com>|Date:=20Sat,=2027=20Sep=202014=2013:27: 05=20+0100|From:=20Gabriele=20Biucchi=20<gbiucchi@yahoo.de>|To:=20 linux_var=20-=20LUG=20di=20Varese=20e=20Provincia=20Mailing=20List =20<talking@ml.linuxvar.it>|In-Reply-To:=20<CAFzX3+d+sdJsHr_oEC6aN xFvxt57amQ2uXytAQd_n6EOwZ7X6g@mail.gmail.com>|Subject:=20Re:=20[li nux_var]=20shellshock=20quali=20sw=20a=20rischio=20?|Reply-To:=20G abriele=20Biucchi=20<gbiucchi@yahoo.de>,=0D=0A=20linux_var=20-=20L UG=20di=20Varese=20e=20Provincia=20Mailing=20List=0D=0A=20<talking @ml.linuxvar.it>|List-Id:=20linux_var=20-=20LUG=20di=20Varese=20e= 20Provincia=20Mailing=20List=0D=0A=20<talking.ml.linuxvar.it>|List -Unsubscribe:=20<http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tal king>,=0D=0A=20<mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=3Dun subscribe>|List-Archive:=20<http://ml.linuxvar.it/pipermail/talkin g/>|List-Post:=20<mailto:talking@ml.linuxvar.it>|List-Help:=20<mai lto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=3Dhelp>|List-Subscribe: =20<http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talking>,=0D=0A =20<mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=3Dsubscribe>; b=S6iVdYBr4AcYhMg34jPTM2yFafCQA4WSs+X8SYYZS+QzSiz/U7+CpEaAT+mH3lpSY wGei/3v40rCAPZ2m1ioPB3S0cZu5KOU8wZC6AyKj9L66TYjiTB7xihtl6Fe2WGJT2e bR4PgzYPPgEk/1urFq/g89MhKtpfTS2V3El7nPGE=
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1411820826; bh=Kud9iCF3tpGPWPDzpluUZ0aN/iT+1rp1pDDGB4pFor0=; h=References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ur8tkUQkaGiMyS0IqT6QPJioFSXFYzuw2udeDspgwZURbXI6gnFcQ/4h1wqPADxuYp3j/3PMGqA5qH/inZEL6pmmrXkyIkhtoFslsDu/n0twIQA9lGHq1NtMtsnYip4M7Dxg/F8aflp+K4ARccw+eo5L4+p4RCvkEQ6HtEleOzc=
In-reply-to: <CAFzX3+d+sdJsHr_oEC6aNxFvxt57amQ2uXytAQd_n6EOwZ7X6g@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://ml.linuxvar.it/pipermail/talking/>
List-help: <mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=help>
List-id: linux_var - LUG di Varese e Provincia Mailing List <talking.ml.linuxvar.it>
List-post: <mailto:talking@ml.linuxvar.it>
List-subscribe: <http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talking>, <mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/options/talking>, <mailto:talking-request@ml.linuxvar.it?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAGod1SBAZ9Htw0MF=nRQjV_DpE17k0s00q-AejAW=GYKF2nByg@mail.gmail.com> <NCI90V$3707C83068D46F597C5A2374ABEBC851@teletu.it> <CAFzX3+d+sdJsHr_oEC6aNxFvxt57amQ2uXytAQd_n6EOwZ7X6g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Gabriele Biucchi <gbiucchi@yahoo.de>, linux_var - LUG di Varese e Provincia Mailing List <talking@ml.linuxvar.it>
Sender: "Talking" <talking-bounces@ml.linuxvar.it>

Ciao


Mr. P|pex <gianluca@pipex.name> schrieb am 12:47 Samstag, 27.September 2014:
Il 26 settembre 2014 12:55, Aladino <geniodelmale@teletu.it> ha scritto:

> infatti con
> X='() { function a a>\' bash -c gohomeyourdrunk
> viene creato il file fohomeyourdrunk ; quindi è ancora vulnerabile.

Io uso Debian stable e oldstable: in entrambi i casi il comando mi da: 

bash: gohomeyourdrunk: command not found

Il file non viene creato.

Gabriele

_______________________________________________
Talking mailing list
Talking@ml.linuxvar.it
http://ml.linuxvar.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talking

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux_var] shellshock quali sw a rischio ?
  - From: "Mr. P|pex" <gianluca@pipex.name>
- Fwd: Re: [linux_var] shellshock quali sw a rischio ?
  - From: Jacopo Girardi <jacopo.girardi@alice.it>

References:
- [linux_var] shellshock quali sw a rischio ?
  - From: Giovanni Orlandi <orlangio@gmail.com>
- Re: [linux_var] shellshock quali sw a rischio ?
  - From: "Aladino" <geniodelmale@teletu.it>
- Re: [linux_var] shellshock quali sw a rischio ?
  - From: "Mr. P|pex" <gianluca@pipex.name>

Prev by Date: Re: [linux_var] [OT] cercasi PHP-coder a Lomazzo (CO)
Next by Date: Re: [linux_var] shellshock quali sw a rischio ?
Previous by thread: Re: [linux_var] shellshock quali sw a rischio ?
Next by thread: Re: [linux_var] shellshock quali sw a rischio ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread